Positive communities are important in learning
I’ve taught in colleges and universities for 25 years. One thing I am reasonably certain about teaching is that a good class has a strong sense of community. It is common sense that a good social atmosphere will be more attractive than a cold, totally clinical atmosphere. There is also a clutch of professional ideas explaining the impact of group norms, collective efficacy, belonging, system boundaries, and so on.
Why, though, do we so much prefer a 500 person auditorium to a pod cast?
What I’ve not been able to put my finger on, until today, is a tight model explaining why communities are so important – why for example we prefer to listen to a lecture in an anonymous 500 person auditorium than on a podcast.
Today my Google Alert flashed up this article on Twittering in Education. A US College Professor set up a class channel on Twitter. Twittering lead to more discussion between students and ultimately to writing a book “online” with completely voluntary help from students as far afield as China.
The post also describes the mechanism.
Meta-cognition & meaning
Conversations lead to community (And v.v. We know it is important to seed a social media channel with conversations.) The conversations lead to ‘meta-cognition’ – talking about the course. And talking about the course helps us understand why and how the course and the material fits into our lives. Greater clarity and shared understandings leads to more community, and more community to better conversations.
Do we get phase states?
Though the article does not say, I suspect that at some stage, the energy moving between conversations, community and meta-cognition (talking about) reaches a tipping point and we see greater levels of learning and action. So we move from the struggling, to the satisfactory, to the spectacular.
I rather suspect that this is a fractal model, such as we see with Happiness. The three characteristics of the class – conversations, community and ‘talking about’ – interplay. When this interplay is healthy, it moves through the broad swathe of emotional space. When we have done well, we celebrate, for example, ultimately ending with someone suggesting we get back to work. When things do not go well, we grieve, ultimately ending with someone suggesting it is time to start living again.
My thoughts on this glittering sunny day in autumn in rural England are to ask:
- are these the three critical variables: conversations, community, and meta-cognition?
- do they interplay with each other in a self-correcting manner going from positive to negative and back again as the need dictates?
- is it right to use a phase state model where we look for the tipping points which take this energy system from the doldrums to OK and then to fantastic?
- do the three variables co-affect each other through a set of Lorenz equations, and if not, how do they inter-relate?
- how can we explore these variables in a field study?
Enough for now. The sun calls. I would love to hear from anyone interested in building communities with or without social media like Twitter.
