The golden rule of economics and politics
It is all that we need to know really. We can afford what we create.
Our plan of work tells us what we can afford
And from the golden rule ~ we can afford what we create ~ we have two other rules.
It is better to work with others than alone
None of us can create everything we want, or need, to afford. It matters that we belong to a bigger group or tribe.
The collective to which we belong tells us what we can afford. Our family, our company, and yes, the country, the sovereign state to which we belong, define what we create and our lifestyle.
When I am writing, someone is creating the electricity that powers this laptop. While another person is making my washing machine (running in the background), I am looking for easy-to-understand writing on our economy that cuts through the obfuscation delivered by politicians.
The system matters. Our place in it also matters. But the whole, the collective, is what we must keep our eye on. Where we draw the boundary matters. Because we can afford what we can create. Who is we. Between us, we create what we can afford.
Draw a circle around who we trust, and who lives and breathes because we live and breathe, and we have defined what we create and what we can afford.
If that circle is too small to define the lifestyle we want, there is our first task. Widen the circle. Widen the magic circle of trust.
We need leaders who instinctively read that circle and work with our neighbors, suppliers and customers to widen our system.
Tell me what you are going to do. Economics will follow.
The second rule that follows the golden rule is that value comes first. We can check the economics afterward.
The clear writing economist, Ann Pettifor, makes this point well.
The central bank in each country should set the money supply to match the economic capacity of a country.
She doesn’t like using a household or small company as an example. So let’s use a giant multinational.
When a giant company needs something done, and they are pretty certain it will work out, they put up the budget and let the managers and workers get on with it. Money comes first in time. But profits, and worrying about profits comes last. Paying back the investors comes last. We will recover our money provided we only put up the amount of money that the work was worth.
But we will never make money unless we have the money to bring a team together and get going.
The skill in managing, and financing, a major investment is understanding what venture is worth.
Before you tell me that business does not work like that. It does. Don’t confuse where you work with successful companies and successful public service. I’ve consulted to them. I’ve led in them.
I have two rules:
- What do you want to do?
- After you’ve told me, we’ll run the numbers to make sure it is economically viable. If not, we go back to question 1. What do you want to do? We begin with the value. We begin with what you want to create. Economics follows. If you want to do it, we will back it.
We can afford what we can create
These are our questions.
What can we create?
Who do we create it with?
What is our potential that we are not using?
To find our potential: ask people. What do you want to do? When that is on the table, we’ll run the numbers. If the numbers hold together, we back their plans.
The golden rule and Britain’s government deficit
Ann Pettifor puts this story in the context of Britain’s government deficit(which is large but not nearly as big as the bank bailouts). She is standing for parliament but don’t let that dissuade you. She writes clearly. That alone is a good reason for electing her.
The collective, Britain, defined by the reach of the Bank of England and the reach of the pound sterling, has potential. Fund it. A simple message. Fund what we can create.
The only question that I ask, and I’ll go to her blog now to ask the question, is how quickly will we recover the money? I think I would like to see the numbers run by month, quarter and year. Then I would feel more comfortable.
Then my trust would increase Then the collective strengthens.
Sometimes economists (and lawyers and accountants) forget that everything they do depends upon us believing it. Yes, the outer boundary is the reach of the pound sterling. The real boundary is our belief in each other. Some people call this belief ‘confidence’ but that is the wrong measure.
Confidence is self-efficacy. The correct measures is collective self-efficacy. The question for that is “Do I believe that you will do better economically this year?” When we answer yes to that question, then we will boom.
But first the question of timing. I must ask Ann that.
For now I am thankful for finding that quotation. Simple. Pithy. We can afford what we create.
Followed by my two rules.
- People matter. Who is we.
- We’ll check the economics after we have decided what we want to do.
P.S. I googled “we can afford what we create” and I didn’t find any other reference to it. Did Ann coin this phrase or is it a well known economic expression?